vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Waters Corporation (WAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Waters Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($932.4M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 24.2%, a 5.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Waters Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Waters Corporation's revenue compounded faster (21.0% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Waters Corporation is an American company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts that provides analytical instruments and software used for chromatography, mass spectrometry, laboratory informatics, and rheometry by the life sciences, materials, and food industries.

KIM vs WAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WAT
WAT
1.7× larger
WAT
$932.4M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WAT
WAT
+2.8% gap
WAT
6.8%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
5.7% more per $
KIM
29.8%
24.2%
WAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WAT
WAT
Annualised
WAT
21.0%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Revenue
$558.0M
$932.4M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$225.2M
Gross Margin
61.1%
Operating Margin
37.2%
29.0%
Net Margin
29.8%
24.2%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
6.8%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-2.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$3.76

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$932.4M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$799.9M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$771.3M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$661.7M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$872.7M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$740.3M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$708.5M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$225.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$148.9M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$147.1M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$121.4M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$231.4M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$161.5M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$142.7M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
61.1%
Q3 25
59.0%
Q2 25
58.3%
Q1 25
58.2%
Q4 24
60.1%
Q3 24
59.3%
Q2 24
59.3%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
29.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
24.0%
Q2 25
39.2%
24.4%
Q1 25
33.6%
22.9%
Q4 24
31.7%
33.5%
Q3 24
33.7%
28.5%
Q2 24
32.1%
26.7%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
24.2%
Q3 25
25.7%
18.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
19.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
18.3%
Q4 24
31.6%
26.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
21.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
20.1%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$3.76
Q3 25
$2.50
Q2 25
$2.47
Q1 25
$2.03
Q4 24
$3.88
Q3 24
$2.71
Q2 24
$2.40

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$587.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$2.6B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$5.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.55×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$587.8M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$459.1M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$367.2M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$382.9M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$325.4M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$331.5M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$327.4M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$1.4B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$1.6B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$2.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.4B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$4.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$4.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$4.6B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$4.6B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$4.5B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$4.4B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.55×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.89×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$164.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.73×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$164.6M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$187.3M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$41.1M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$259.6M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$240.1M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$204.6M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$54.5M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
WAT
WAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
0.73×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.26×
Q2 25
1.87×
0.28×
Q1 25
1.69×
2.14×
Q4 24
1.44×
1.04×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.27×
Q2 24
2.46×
0.38×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

WAT
WAT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons