vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. (WMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($693.4M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.2× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 13.5%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 3.0%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (ADS) is an American company that designs, manufactures and markets polypropylene and polyethylene pipes, plastic leach field chambers and systems, septic tanks and accessories, storm retention/detention and septic chambers, polyvinyl chloride drainage structures, fittings, and water filters and water separators. It is the largest maker of high-density polyethylene pipe in the United States. It is headquartered in Hilliard, Ohio. In 2020, 93% of the company's s...

KIM vs WMS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WMS
WMS
1.2× larger
WMS
$693.4M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+3.6% gap
KIM
4.0%
0.4%
WMS
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
16.3% more per $
KIM
29.8%
13.5%
WMS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
3.0%
WMS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Revenue
$558.0M
$693.4M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$93.6M
Gross Margin
37.4%
Operating Margin
37.2%
19.7%
Net Margin
29.8%
13.5%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
0.4%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
15.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$1.19

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$693.4M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$850.4M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$829.9M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$615.8M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$690.5M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$782.6M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$815.3M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$93.6M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$156.0M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$143.9M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$77.2M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$81.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$130.4M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$161.4M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
37.4%
Q3 25
40.0%
Q2 25
39.8%
Q1 25
36.7%
Q4 24
35.0%
Q3 24
37.6%
Q2 24
40.8%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
19.7%
Q3 25
34.9%
26.3%
Q2 25
39.2%
24.8%
Q1 25
33.6%
19.0%
Q4 24
31.7%
18.4%
Q3 24
33.7%
23.9%
Q2 24
32.1%
27.7%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
13.5%
Q3 25
25.7%
18.3%
Q2 25
31.0%
17.3%
Q1 25
24.8%
12.5%
Q4 24
31.6%
11.8%
Q3 24
26.8%
16.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
19.8%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$1.19
Q3 25
$1.99
Q2 25
$1.84
Q1 25
$0.99
Q4 24
$1.04
Q3 24
$1.67
Q2 24
$2.06

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.9B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$4.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$159.3M
$812.9M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$638.3M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$463.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$488.9M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$613.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$541.6M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.9B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.3B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$4.1B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$4.1B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.9B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$3.6B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$3.5B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$3.4B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.83×
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$269.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$183.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
26.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.88×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$577.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$269.3M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$234.9M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$275.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$41.2M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$189.9M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$166.9M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$183.4M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$183.6M
Q3 25
$176.4M
Q2 25
$222.4M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-5.3M
Q4 24
$135.7M
Q3 24
$112.4M
Q2 24
$125.7M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
26.5%
Q3 25
20.7%
Q2 25
26.8%
Q1 25
38.3%
-0.9%
Q4 24
19.7%
Q3 24
14.4%
Q2 24
15.4%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
12.4%
Q3 25
0.0%
6.9%
Q2 25
0.0%
6.3%
Q1 25
3.4%
7.6%
Q4 24
7.9%
Q3 24
7.0%
Q2 24
7.1%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
WMS
WMS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
2.88×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.51×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.91×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.53×
Q4 24
1.44×
2.34×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.28×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

WMS
WMS

Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment$557.3M80%
Other$85.5M12%
Pipe$35.5M5%
Allied Products And Other$15.0M2%

Related Comparisons