vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and WillScot Holdings Corp (WSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WillScot Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($566.0M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.0× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -33.1%, a 62.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -1.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

WillScot Holdings Corp is a leading provider of modular space solutions and portable storage services across North America. It serves a wide range of sectors including construction, commercial development, education, healthcare, government projects, and special events, offering flexible, scalable temporary and semi-permanent space solutions tailored to diverse client needs.

KIM vs WSC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WSC
WSC
1.0× larger
WSC
$566.0M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+10.1% gap
KIM
4.0%
-6.1%
WSC
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
62.9% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-33.1%
WSC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-1.8%
WSC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Revenue
$558.0M
$566.0M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$-187.3M
Gross Margin
50.4%
Operating Margin
37.2%
-32.5%
Net Margin
29.8%
-33.1%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-6.1%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-310.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$-1.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$566.0M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$566.8M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$589.1M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$559.6M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$602.5M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$601.4M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$604.6M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$-187.3M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$43.3M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$47.9M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$43.1M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$89.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-70.5M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-46.9M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
50.4%
Q3 25
49.7%
Q2 25
50.3%
Q1 25
53.7%
Q4 24
55.8%
Q3 24
53.5%
Q2 24
54.1%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
-32.5%
Q3 25
34.9%
21.0%
Q2 25
39.2%
21.5%
Q1 25
33.6%
21.3%
Q4 24
31.7%
28.9%
Q3 24
33.7%
-5.9%
Q2 24
32.1%
-0.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
-33.1%
Q3 25
25.7%
7.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
8.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
7.7%
Q4 24
31.6%
14.8%
Q3 24
26.8%
-11.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
-7.7%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-1.02
Q3 25
$0.24
Q2 25
$0.26
Q1 25
$0.23
Q4 24
$0.48
Q3 24
$-0.37
Q2 24
$-0.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$14.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$856.3M
Total Assets
$19.6B
$5.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$14.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$14.8M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$12.8M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$10.7M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$9.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$11.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$5.9M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$3.6B
Q3 25
$3.6B
Q2 25
$3.7B
Q1 25
$3.6B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
Q2 24
$3.5B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$856.3M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.2B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$5.8B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$6.1B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$6.1B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$6.0B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$6.0B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$6.0B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$6.0B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
4.15×
Q3 25
3.39×
Q2 25
3.55×
Q1 25
3.56×
Q4 24
0.75×
3.62×
Q3 24
3.42×
Q2 24
2.88×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$158.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$149.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
26.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$737.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$158.9M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$191.2M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$205.3M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$206.6M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$178.9M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$-1.6M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$175.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$149.7M
Q3 25
$186.9M
Q2 25
$199.0M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$202.0M
Q4 24
$176.6M
Q3 24
$-4.9M
Q2 24
$169.4M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
26.5%
Q3 25
33.0%
Q2 25
33.8%
Q1 25
38.3%
36.1%
Q4 24
29.3%
Q3 24
-0.8%
Q2 24
28.0%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
1.6%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.7%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.8%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
1.0%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
WSC
WSC
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
4.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
4.28×
Q1 25
1.69×
4.80×
Q4 24
1.44×
2.01×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

WSC
WSC

Modular Space Leasing$249.8M44%
Value Added Product And Services$101.0M18%
Portable Storage Leasing$83.0M15%
Delivery Revenue$48.2M9%
Installation Revenue$45.0M8%
Rental Units$19.7M3%
New Units$15.5M3%
Value Added Services$10.3M2%
Other Leasing Related Products And Services$3.8M1%

Related Comparisons