vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS) and Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.4M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.2× Mama's Creations, Inc.). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.2% vs 1.1%, a 25.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mama's Creations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.0% vs 34.0%). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($73.1M vs $3.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs 25.6%).
Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
KINS vs MAMA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.4M | $47.3M |
| Net Profit | $14.8M | $540.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 32.7% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 26.2% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.0% | 50.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 171.4% | 31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.7M | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $35.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $33.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $31.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.5M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.8M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $540.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $410.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $553.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | 32.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $122.7M | $49.6M |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $84.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.7M | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.2M | $24.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.7M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.6M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.4M | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.4M | $47.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.9M | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.0M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $319.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.3M | $45.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.9M | $3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $73.1M | $3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 129.5% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.14× | 7.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $124.0M | $6.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $-857.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $73.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 129.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 132.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.14× | 7.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | 4.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.60× | -0.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.65× | 11.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.12× | -2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 6.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.27× | 4.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
