vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($253.4M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.3× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 20.2%). Palomar Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($409.0M vs $-11.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
KLIC vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $131.1M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.7M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.8M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $532.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.
