vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.2× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 8.4%, a 16.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $-11.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
KLIC vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $157.7M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.4M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $261.5M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
