vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $121.0M, roughly 1.6× GeneDx Holdings Corp.). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -14.6%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GeneDx Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 20.2%). GeneDx Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-7.4M vs $-11.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
GeneDx is a genetic testing company that was founded in 2000 by two scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Sherri Bale and John Compton. They started the company to provide clinical diagnostic services for patients and families with rare and ultra-rare disorders, for which no such commercial testing was available at the time. The company started in the Technology Development Center, a biotech incubator supported by the state of Maryland and Montgomery County, MD. In 2006, Bi...
KLIC vs WGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $121.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $-17.7M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | -14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -424.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $95.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.5M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-17.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-29.2M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 62.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.9% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.0% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -41.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $171.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $54.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $308.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $523.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $141.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $308.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $292.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $277.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $257.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $245.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $204.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $194.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $523.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $493.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $463.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $446.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $419.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $408.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $389.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $-3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $-7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | -6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
WGS
| Diagnostic Test Third Party Insurance | $101.1M | 84% |
| Diagnostic Test Institutional Customers | $15.5M | 13% |
| Other | $3.4M | 3% |
