vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and RYDER SYSTEM INC (R). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimberly-Clark is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.2B vs $3.1B, roughly 1.3× RYDER SYSTEM INC). Kimberly-Clark runs the higher net margin — 16.2% vs 3.0%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimberly-Clark posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, RYDER SYSTEM INC's revenue compounded faster (-0.9% CAGR vs -9.0%).

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational consumer goods and personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.

KMB vs R — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KMB
KMB
1.3× larger
KMB
$4.2B
$3.1B
R
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KMB
KMB
+1.7% gap
KMB
2.7%
1.0%
R
Higher net margin
KMB
KMB
13.2% more per $
KMB
16.2%
3.0%
R
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
R
R
Annualised
R
-0.9%
-9.0%
KMB

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KMB
KMB
R
R
Revenue
$4.2B
$3.1B
Net Profit
$675.0M
$93.0M
Gross Margin
36.8%
Operating Margin
18.1%
Net Margin
16.2%
3.0%
Revenue YoY
2.7%
1.0%
Net Profit YoY
17.3%
-5.1%
EPS (diluted)
$2.00
$2.34

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$4.2B
$3.1B
Q4 25
$3.3B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$4.2B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$4.8B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$4.9B
$3.2B
Q3 24
$5.0B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$5.0B
$3.2B
Net Profit
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$675.0M
$93.0M
Q4 25
$499.0M
$132.0M
Q3 25
$446.0M
$138.0M
Q2 25
$509.0M
$131.0M
Q1 25
$567.0M
$98.0M
Q4 24
$447.0M
$135.0M
Q3 24
$907.0M
$142.0M
Q2 24
$544.0M
$127.0M
Gross Margin
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
36.8%
Q4 25
37.7%
Q3 25
36.0%
Q2 25
35.0%
Q1 25
35.8%
Q4 24
34.0%
Q3 24
36.0%
Q2 24
36.0%
Operating Margin
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
18.1%
Q4 25
11.2%
5.6%
Q3 25
15.0%
6.0%
Q2 25
14.2%
5.8%
Q1 25
15.9%
4.3%
Q4 24
11.1%
5.7%
Q3 24
23.3%
5.9%
Q2 24
13.0%
5.6%
Net Margin
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
16.2%
3.0%
Q4 25
15.1%
4.2%
Q3 25
10.7%
4.4%
Q2 25
12.2%
4.1%
Q1 25
11.7%
3.1%
Q4 24
9.1%
4.2%
Q3 24
18.3%
4.5%
Q2 24
10.8%
4.0%
EPS (diluted)
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$2.00
$2.34
Q4 25
$1.50
$3.22
Q3 25
$1.34
$3.32
Q2 25
$1.53
$3.13
Q1 25
$1.70
$2.27
Q4 24
$1.34
$3.09
Q3 24
$2.69
$3.24
Q2 24
$1.61
$2.84

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KMB
KMB
R
R
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$542.0K
$182.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$6.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9M
$2.9B
Total Assets
$17.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.38×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$542.0K
$182.0M
Q4 25
$688.0M
$198.0M
Q3 25
$617.0M
$189.0M
Q2 25
$634.0M
$180.0M
Q1 25
$563.0M
$151.0M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$154.0M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$162.0M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$164.0M
Total Debt
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$6.5M
Q4 25
$6.5B
$6.8B
Q3 25
$6.5B
$7.3B
Q2 25
$6.5B
$7.0B
Q1 25
$6.5B
$6.7B
Q4 24
$6.9B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$6.9B
$6.6B
Q2 24
$7.2B
$6.5B
Stockholders' Equity
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$1.9M
$2.9B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$3.1B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$840.0M
$3.1B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$3.1B
Total Assets
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$17.2M
Q4 25
$17.1B
$16.4B
Q3 25
$16.9B
$16.5B
Q2 25
$16.8B
$16.5B
Q1 25
$16.3B
$16.4B
Q4 24
$16.5B
$16.7B
Q3 24
$17.2B
$16.5B
Q2 24
$17.3B
$16.4B
Debt / Equity
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
3.38×
Q4 25
4.31×
2.24×
Q3 25
4.86×
2.35×
Q2 25
5.09×
2.27×
Q1 25
5.89×
2.21×
Q4 24
8.18×
2.14×
Q3 24
5.36×
2.17×
Q2 24
6.30×
2.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KMB
KMB
R
R
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$583.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$273.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
13.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.27×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$595.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$583.0M
Q4 25
$972.0M
$749.0M
Q3 25
$708.0M
$442.0M
Q2 25
$770.0M
$752.0M
Q1 25
$327.0M
$651.0M
Q4 24
$817.0M
$558.0M
Q3 24
$958.0M
$629.0M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$552.0M
Free Cash Flow
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
$273.0M
Q4 25
$575.0M
$344.0M
Q3 25
$368.0M
$-85.0M
Q2 25
$573.0M
$63.0M
Q1 25
$123.0M
$137.0M
Q4 24
$608.0M
$-201.0M
Q3 24
$798.0M
$30.0M
Q2 24
$863.0M
$-87.0M
FCF Margin
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
17.5%
10.8%
Q3 25
8.9%
-2.7%
Q2 25
13.8%
2.0%
Q1 25
2.5%
4.4%
Q4 24
12.3%
-6.3%
Q3 24
16.1%
0.9%
Q2 24
17.2%
-2.7%
Capex Intensity
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
13.7%
Q4 25
12.1%
12.8%
Q3 25
8.2%
16.6%
Q2 25
4.7%
21.6%
Q1 25
4.2%
16.4%
Q4 24
4.2%
23.8%
Q3 24
3.2%
18.9%
Q2 24
3.1%
20.1%
Cash Conversion
KMB
KMB
R
R
Q1 26
6.27×
Q4 25
1.95×
5.67×
Q3 25
1.59×
3.20×
Q2 25
1.51×
5.74×
Q1 25
0.58×
6.64×
Q4 24
1.83×
4.13×
Q3 24
1.06×
4.43×
Q2 24
1.88×
4.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KMB
KMB

NA$2.7B64%
IPC$1.5B36%

R
R

Fleet Management Solutions$1.5B47%
ChoiceLease$878.0M28%
Dedicated Transportation Solutions$553.0M18%
Commercial rental$211.0M7%

Related Comparisons