vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.4× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 0.0%, a 31.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Swift Transportation is an American truckload motor shipping carrier based in Phoenix, Arizona. In 2017, Swift merged with Knight Transportation, also of Phoenix, forming Knight-Swift.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
KNX vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $96.0K | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.0% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -76.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | $96.0K | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.8M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.5M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.5M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.01 | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $222.8M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $222.8M | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $220.4M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.7M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.3M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.5M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.3M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.3M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.5M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $142.5M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1484.79× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $142.5M | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $723.2M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $217.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.5M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.4M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.3M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.4M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1484.79× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.67× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.32× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.57× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.95× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.03× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.47× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
