vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Koppers Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($432.7M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.7× LendingClub Corp). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 6.9%, a 13.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -9.3%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
KOP vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $432.7M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $29.7M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.3% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 391.2% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.44 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.7M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.3M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.8M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.5M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.3M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.2M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.44 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.17 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.68 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $928.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $574.0M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.62× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $928.3M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.9M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.5M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $989.0M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $939.5M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $989.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $574.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $509.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.62× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.92× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.6M | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.6M | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
