vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP) and ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Koppers Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($432.7M vs $242.1M, roughly 1.8× ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd). Koppers Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 5.0%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -9.3%). Koppers Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.5M vs $14.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
KOP vs OSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $432.7M | $242.1M |
| Net Profit | $29.7M | $12.1M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.3% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 391.2% | -16.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.44 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $432.7M | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.3M | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.8M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.5M | $219.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.3M | $241.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.2M | $224.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $497.6M | $211.2M |
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.0M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.44 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.17 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.68 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $16.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $928.3M | $84.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $574.0M | $542.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $707.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.62× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $65.4M |
| Q4 25 | $928.3M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.9M | $85.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.5M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $989.0M | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $939.5M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $989.4M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $123.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $877.6M | $138.6M |
| Q4 25 | $574.0M | $542.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $552.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.8M | $548.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $530.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $554.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.3M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $509.2M | $532.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.8M | $515.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $707.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $732.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $708.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $746.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $734.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $756.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $763.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.62× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.92× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.74× | 0.27× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.1M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | $14.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.5M | $68.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.6M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.3M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.6M | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.8% | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.95× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
