vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KOSS CORP (KOSS) and Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Belpointe PREP, LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1M vs $2.9M, roughly 1.1× KOSS CORP). KOSS CORP runs the higher net margin — -19.8% vs -380.8%, a 361.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Belpointe PREP, LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (180.1% vs -19.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Belpointe PREP, LLC's revenue compounded faster (201.5% CAGR vs 4.2%).
Koss Corporation is a company in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US that manufactures headphones. The company created the first high-fidelity stereo headphones in 1958.
KOSS vs OZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9M | $3.1M |
| Net Profit | $-565.4K | $-11.7M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -35.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -19.8% | -380.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.6% | 180.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -700.6% | -41.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-3.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $860.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $384.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $337.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-565.4K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.7K | $-12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-232.7K | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.7K | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.1K | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-419.5K | $-6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-110.4K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-313.8K | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.8% | -380.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -509.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.5% | -381.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.4% | -495.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -752.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.1% | -805.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | -1229.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.9% | -1181.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-3.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-3.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-2.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-2.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-2.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-1.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-1.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $24.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $260.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $30.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $36.8M | $564.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $29.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $260.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $251.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $228.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $86.9M |
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | $564.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | $570.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.2M | $556.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.3M | $537.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $517.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.1M | $495.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.2M | $476.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.6M | $450.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-760.8K | $-25.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-546.7K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-760.8K | $-25.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $762.6K | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-534.9K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.4K | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-252.0K | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.6K | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-174.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $328.6K | $-6.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $761.5K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-541.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-314.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-155.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-174.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | -37.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.