vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.9M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.8× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -19.9%, a 46.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Katapult Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs -20.7%). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
KPLT vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.9M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $19.8M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 307.3% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.1M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-570.0K | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.2% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.7% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.17 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.61 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.4M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-38.1M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $107.9M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.4M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.1M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.7M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.5M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.6M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.0M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.6M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.6M | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.9M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.0M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.2% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.6M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-628.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-653.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -16.2% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KPLT
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
