vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.6M vs $73.9M, roughly 1.2× Katapult Holdings, Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -5.9%, a 32.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Katapult Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 7.2%). Katapult Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.0M vs $-78.6M). Over the past eight quarters, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
KPLT vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.9M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $19.8M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 307.3% | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.0M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.1M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-570.0K | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.9% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.17 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.61 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.4M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-38.1M | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $107.9M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.4M | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.1M | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.7M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.5M | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.6M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.9M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.0M | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.2% | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.6M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-628.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-653.0K | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | -16.2% | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.8% | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KPLT
Segment breakdown not available.
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
