vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $73.9M, roughly 1.8× Katapult Holdings, Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs 17.1%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Katapult Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
KPLT vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.9M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $19.8M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 307.3% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.9% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.23 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.17 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.61 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.4M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-38.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $107.9M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.6M | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.9M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.60× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.6M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-628.0K | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-653.0K | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.2% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.60× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KPLT
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
