vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and MASIMO CORP (MASI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MASIMO CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($371.5M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.4× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -27.0%, a 33.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KILROY REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.0% vs -26.4%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $50.9M). Over the past eight quarters, KILROY REALTY CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -17.7%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Masimo Corporation is an American health technology and consumer electronics company headquartered in Irvine, California. The company develops patient monitoring devices, non-invasive sensors, and related software platforms used in hospital and home settings. Masimo has also operated in the consumer audio and wearable device markets.
KRC vs MASI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $371.5M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $-100.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | -26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -1124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $372.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $600.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $496.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $492.8M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $-100.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $51.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $-170.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $-349.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | -45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -58.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $-1.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-3.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $-6.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $312.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $559.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $810.0M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $312.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $149.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $130.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $177.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $158.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $157.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $559.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $613.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $765.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $772.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $781.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $876.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $810.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $946.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.64× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $56.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $50.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 13.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $191.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $50.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $74.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $45.8M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $65.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $37.6M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 4.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 2.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.