vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $218.2M, roughly 1.2× ONTO INNOVATION INC.). ONTO INNOVATION INC. runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 6.3%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KILROY REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.0% vs -13.5%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $82.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ONTO INNOVATION INC.'s revenue compounded faster (2.6% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
KRC vs ONTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $218.2M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $28.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | -13.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -46.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $218.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $253.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $263.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $252.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $242.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $228.8M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $64.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $52.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $46.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 20.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.57 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $603.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $603.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $203.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $190.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $2.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $83.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $82.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 2.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $261.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $83.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $57.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $92.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $67.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $57.1M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $44.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 1.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
