vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.3× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -10.8%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $109.2M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
KRC vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
