vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.5× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 6.3%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $92.8M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
KRC vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
