vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP (PRGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $252.7M, roughly 1.1× PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP). PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs 6.3%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.5% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $59.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP's revenue compounded faster (17.0% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Progress Software Corporation develops and sells enterprise software products including application development platforms, data connectivity tools, and digital experience solutions. It serves global enterprise clients across finance, healthcare, manufacturing, retail and other sectors, helping organizations build scalable, high-performance business applications and streamline operational workflows.
KRC vs PRGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $252.7M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $25.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 10.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 17.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 2144.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $252.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $237.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $238.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $178.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $175.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $184.7M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $22.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 81.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 82.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 12.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $94.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $478.3M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $102.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $124.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $118.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $133.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $478.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $477.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $452.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $431.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $438.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $401.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $461.7M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $62.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $59.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 23.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 2.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $229.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $62.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $73.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $68.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $63.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $70.5M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $59.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $72.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $29.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $67.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $70.2M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 38.0% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 2.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 3.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | 6.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 17.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 3.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 3.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
PRGS
| Maintenanceand Services | $187.5M | 74% |
| Share File Acquisition | $67.5M | 27% |
