vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.1× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 6.3%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tecnoglass Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
KRC vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
