vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.4× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 1.7%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $60.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
KRC vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
