vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.0× KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.). ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — -72.1% vs -101.7%, a 29.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-26.6% vs -28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-18.8% CAGR vs -29.7%).
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
KREF vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.8M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-26.2M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -105.1% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -101.7% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.6% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -229.6% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.49 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.8M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.2M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.1M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.0M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.4M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.1M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-26.2M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.7M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | -105.1% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -101.3% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.3% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.8% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | -101.7% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.4% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -98.5% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.5% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.7% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.0% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.49 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.53 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $84.6M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.1M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.7M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.4M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.9M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.8M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.2M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.5M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3B | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.3M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $72.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.6M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.5M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KREF
Segment breakdown not available.
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
