vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) and PARK AEROSPACE CORP (PKE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.8M vs $17.3M, roughly 1.5× PARK AEROSPACE CORP). PARK AEROSPACE CORP runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -101.7%, a 118.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK AEROSPACE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs -26.6%). Over the past eight quarters, PARK AEROSPACE CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.0% CAGR vs -18.8%).
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
Park Electrochemical Corp, now called the Park Aerospace Corp, is a Melville, New York-based materials manufacturer for the telecommunications, Internet infrastructure, high-end computing, and aerospace industries. It produces high-technology digital and radio frequency(RF)/microwave printed circuit material products, composite materials. Its printed circuit materials are used for complex multilayer printed circuit boards and other electronic interconnection systems, such as multilayer back-p...
KREF vs PKE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.8M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | $-26.2M | $3.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -105.1% | 21.0% |
| Net Margin | -101.7% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.6% | 20.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -229.6% | 87.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.49 | $0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.2M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.0M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.4M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.1M | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-26.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $993.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.3% |
| Q4 25 | -105.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -101.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | -101.7% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -98.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.49 | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.53 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $84.6M | $63.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $106.6M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $118.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.1M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.7M | $65.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.4M | $68.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.9M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.8M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.2M | $74.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.5M | $77.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $106.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $105.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $107.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $110.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $111.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $118.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $120.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $122.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $124.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $125.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $129.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3B | $132.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.3M | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $72.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $969.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $-423.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.5M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $338.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-435.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | -0.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.54× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | -0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KREF
Segment breakdown not available.
PKE
| North America | $16.8M | 97% |
| Other | $546.0K | 3% |
