vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST (KRG) and MARCUS CORP (MCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.7M vs $193.5M, roughly 1.0× MARCUS CORP). On growth, MARCUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs -9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, MARCUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -2.8%).

Kite Realty Group Trust is a publicly traded U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality open-air shopping centers and mixed-use properties, with a portfolio spanning key regional markets across the United States. Its tenant base includes national retail chains, local independent merchants, and dining and entertainment operators, serving local community consumer needs.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is an American company that provides real estate brokerage, mortgage brokerage, research, and advisory services in the U.S. and Canada in the field of commercial property. It popularized the practice of listing properties exclusively with one brokerage firm. The company has over 1,800 employees in more than 80 offices across the U.S. and Canada.

KRG vs MCS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KRG
KRG
1.0× larger
KRG
$200.7M
$193.5M
MCS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MCS
MCS
+12.0% gap
MCS
2.8%
-9.2%
KRG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MCS
MCS
Annualised
MCS
18.2%
-2.8%
KRG

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Revenue
$200.7M
$193.5M
Net Profit
$330.0K
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
0.9%
Net Margin
0.2%
Revenue YoY
-9.2%
2.8%
Net Profit YoY
-51.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
$200.7M
Q4 25
$204.2M
$193.5M
Q3 25
$205.1M
$210.2M
Q2 25
$213.4M
$206.0M
Q1 25
$221.8M
$148.8M
Q4 24
$214.7M
$188.3M
Q3 24
$207.3M
$232.7M
Q2 24
$212.4M
$176.0M
Net Profit
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
$330.0K
Q4 25
$180.8M
Q3 25
$-16.2M
$16.2M
Q2 25
$110.3M
$7.3M
Q1 25
$23.7M
$-16.8M
Q4 24
$21.8M
$986.0K
Q3 24
$16.7M
$23.3M
Q2 24
$-48.6M
$-20.2M
Operating Margin
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.9%
Q3 25
10.8%
Q2 25
6.3%
Q1 25
24.2%
-13.7%
Q4 24
23.0%
-1.2%
Q3 24
21.7%
14.1%
Q2 24
-10.5%
1.3%
Net Margin
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
0.2%
Q4 25
88.6%
Q3 25
-7.9%
7.7%
Q2 25
51.7%
3.6%
Q1 25
10.7%
-11.3%
Q4 24
10.2%
0.5%
Q3 24
8.1%
10.0%
Q2 24
-22.9%
-11.5%
EPS (diluted)
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
$0.06
Q4 25
$0.83
Q3 25
$-0.07
Q2 25
$0.50
Q1 25
$0.11
Q4 24
$0.10
Q3 24
$0.08
Q2 24
$-0.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$32.5M
$23.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$159.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.9B
$457.4M
Total Assets
$6.4B
$1.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
$32.5M
Q4 25
$36.8M
$23.4M
Q3 25
$68.7M
$7.4M
Q2 25
$182.0M
$14.9M
Q1 25
$49.1M
$11.9M
Q4 24
$478.1M
$40.8M
Q3 24
$467.5M
$28.4M
Q2 24
$273.8M
$32.8M
Total Debt
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$3.0B
$159.0M
Q3 25
$2.9B
$162.0M
Q2 25
$3.0B
$179.9M
Q1 25
$2.9B
$198.9M
Q4 24
$3.2B
$159.1M
Q3 24
$3.2B
$173.1M
Q2 24
$3.0B
$175.7M
Stockholders' Equity
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$3.1B
$457.4M
Q3 25
$3.2B
$454.3M
Q2 25
$3.3B
$448.4M
Q1 25
$3.3B
$441.8M
Q4 24
$3.3B
$464.9M
Q3 24
$3.3B
$462.3M
Q2 24
$3.4B
$449.4M
Total Assets
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
$6.4B
Q4 25
$6.7B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$6.6B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$6.9B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$6.7B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$7.1B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$7.1B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$7.0B
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.98×
0.35×
Q3 25
0.93×
0.36×
Q2 25
0.91×
0.40×
Q1 25
0.89×
0.45×
Q4 24
0.97×
0.34×
Q3 24
0.97×
0.37×
Q2 24
0.88×
0.39×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$48.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$26.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.3%
11.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$989.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$106.6M
$48.8M
Q3 25
$116.2M
$39.1M
Q2 25
$132.8M
$31.6M
Q1 25
$74.1M
$-35.3M
Q4 24
$111.0M
$52.6M
Q3 24
$112.4M
$30.5M
Q2 24
$142.1M
$36.0M
Free Cash Flow
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$26.4M
Q3 25
$18.2M
Q2 25
$14.7M
Q1 25
$-58.3M
Q4 24
$27.1M
Q3 24
$12.0M
Q2 24
$16.1M
FCF Margin
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
13.6%
Q3 25
8.7%
Q2 25
7.1%
Q1 25
-39.2%
Q4 24
14.4%
Q3 24
5.2%
Q2 24
9.2%
Capex Intensity
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
3.3%
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
9.9%
Q2 25
8.2%
Q1 25
15.5%
Q4 24
13.5%
Q3 24
7.9%
Q2 24
11.3%
Cash Conversion
KRG
KRG
MCS
MCS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.59×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.20×
4.32×
Q1 25
3.12×
Q4 24
5.09×
53.31×
Q3 24
6.72×
1.31×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRG
KRG

Rental income$198.0M99%
Fee income$1.3M1%

MCS
MCS

Theatres$123.1M64%
Concessions$51.0M26%
Food And Beverage$21.2M11%

Related Comparisons