vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST (KRG) and RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. (RGP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.7M vs $117.7M, roughly 1.7× RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.). KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST runs the higher net margin — 0.2% vs -10.8%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.2% vs -19.2%). Over the past eight quarters, KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST's revenue compounded faster (-2.8% CAGR vs -11.8%).
Kite Realty Group Trust is a publicly traded U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality open-air shopping centers and mixed-use properties, with a portfolio spanning key regional markets across the United States. Its tenant base includes national retail chains, local independent merchants, and dining and entertainment operators, serving local community consumer needs.
RGP, formerly known as Resources Global Professionals, is the operating arm of Resources Connection, Inc.. The company provides consulting services in the areas of finance & accounting, information management, governance, risk & compliance (GRC), human capital, legal & regulatory, corporate advisory & restructuring, strategic communications, and supply chain management. As of fiscal year ending May 28, 2016, the company employed 3,283 professionals in 68 offices in 20 countries around the wor...
KRG vs RGP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.7M | $117.7M |
| Net Profit | $330.0K | $-12.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.2% | -19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.6% | 81.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.2M | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.1M | $120.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.4M | $139.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $221.8M | $129.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $214.7M | $145.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.3M | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $212.4M | $148.2M |
| Q1 26 | $330.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.8M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.3M | $-73.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.6M | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -38.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -52.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.5% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 88.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.9% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.7% | -52.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | -34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -47.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.9% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $-2.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $-1.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.5M | $89.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $194.6M |
| Total Assets | $6.4B | $289.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | $89.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.7M | $77.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.0M | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $72.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.1M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $467.5M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.8M | $108.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $206.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $207.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $277.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $325.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $407.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $418.8M |
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $289.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $287.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $304.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $375.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $424.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $512.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $510.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $15.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $24.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.6M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.2M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.8M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.1M | $659.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $-309.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.1M | $3.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $238.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-575.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRG
| Rental income | $198.0M | 99% |
| Fee income | $1.3M | 1% |
RGP
| US | $93.7M | 80% |
| Non Us | $24.0M | 20% |
