vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.1M vs $44.3M, roughly 1.6× Kearny Financial Corp.). Kearny Financial Corp. runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 2.0%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kearny Financial Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs -1.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Kearny Financial Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (9.3% CAGR vs -4.7%).
Kearny Financial Corp. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Kearny Bank, a community-focused financial institution. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, mortgages, business loans, and wealth management services, primarily serving customers across New Jersey and the New York metropolitan region.
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
KRNY vs RMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | $10.1M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.8% | -1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.3% | -75.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 27 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.5M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.8M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.6M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.5M | $72.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.1M | $78.5M |
| Q1 27 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $966.0K |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 19.4% |
| Q1 27 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.2% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 1.2% |
| Q1 27 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $123.8M | $118.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $432.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $763.0M | $452.4M |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $582.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.96× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 27 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.3M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.1M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.3M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.1M | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.6M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.6M | $83.8M |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $432.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $434.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $435.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $437.2M |
| Q1 27 | $763.0M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $763.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $757.4M | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $753.2M | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $746.0M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $748.1M | $433.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $744.9M | $429.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $751.5M | $423.1M |
| Q1 27 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $582.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $582.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7B | $571.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $581.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $578.6M |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $40.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $33.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 47.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $56.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.3M | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $17.6M |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.3M |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 27 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 28.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.16× | 4.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.66× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.40× | 10.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 18.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRNY
Segment breakdown not available.
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
