vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of KURA SUSHI USA, INC. (KRUS) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KURA SUSHI USA, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.5M vs $51.0M, roughly 1.4× LandBridge Co LLC). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 35.0% vs -4.2%, a 39.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs 14.0%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($40.9M vs $-13.3M). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (40.2% CAGR vs 13.2%).

Kura Sushi, Inc. is a Japanese conveyor belt sushi restaurant chain. It is the second largest sushi restaurant chain in Japan, behind Sushiro and ahead of Hama Sushi. Its headquarters are in Sakai, Osaka Prefecture. It has 543 locations in Japan, 56 in Taiwan, and 69 in the United States.

KRUS vs LB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KRUS
KRUS
1.4× larger
KRUS
$73.5M
$51.0M
LB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LB
LB
+2.1% gap
LB
16.0%
14.0%
KRUS
Higher net margin
LB
LB
39.2% more per $
LB
35.0%
-4.2%
KRUS
More free cash flow
LB
LB
$54.2M more FCF
LB
$40.9M
$-13.3M
KRUS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LB
LB
Annualised
LB
40.2%
13.2%
KRUS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Revenue
$73.5M
$51.0M
Net Profit
$-3.1M
$17.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-5.0%
57.2%
Net Margin
-4.2%
35.0%
Revenue YoY
14.0%
16.0%
Net Profit YoY
-218.4%
15.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.25

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$51.0M
Q4 25
$73.5M
$56.8M
Q3 25
$79.4M
$50.8M
Q2 25
$74.0M
$47.5M
Q1 25
$64.9M
$44.0M
Q4 24
$64.5M
$36.5M
Q3 24
$66.0M
$28.5M
Q2 24
$63.1M
$26.0M
Net Profit
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$17.9M
Q4 25
$-3.1M
$8.1M
Q3 25
$2.3M
$8.1M
Q2 25
$565.0K
$7.5M
Q1 25
$-3.8M
$6.5M
Q4 24
$-961.0K
$49.3M
Q3 24
$-5.2M
$2.7M
Q2 24
$-558.0K
$-57.7M
Operating Margin
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
57.2%
Q4 25
-5.0%
60.0%
Q3 25
1.8%
60.8%
Q2 25
-0.2%
60.0%
Q1 25
-7.1%
57.0%
Q4 24
-2.3%
49.4%
Q3 24
-8.8%
11.2%
Q2 24
-1.9%
-197.4%
Net Margin
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
35.0%
Q4 25
-4.2%
14.2%
Q3 25
2.9%
15.9%
Q2 25
0.8%
15.8%
Q1 25
-5.8%
14.7%
Q4 24
-1.5%
135.2%
Q3 24
-7.9%
9.3%
Q2 24
-0.9%
-222.1%
EPS (diluted)
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.25
$0.24
Q3 25
$0.18
$0.26
Q2 25
$0.05
$0.24
Q1 25
$-0.31
$0.20
Q4 24
$-0.08
Q3 24
$-0.47
$-0.04
Q2 24
$-0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$50.7M
$29.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$433.0K
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$229.2M
Total Assets
$443.5M
$1.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$29.7M
Q4 25
$50.7M
$30.7M
Q3 25
$62.5M
$28.3M
Q2 25
$60.5M
$20.3M
Q1 25
$85.2M
$14.9M
Q4 24
$107.7M
$37.0M
Q3 24
$51.0M
$14.4M
Q2 24
$60.7M
$24.6M
Total Debt
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$433.0K
Q4 25
$570.7M
Q3 25
$366.1M
Q2 25
$370.9M
Q1 25
$375.5M
Q4 24
$385.5M
Q3 24
$242.4M
Q2 24
$360.8M
Stockholders' Equity
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$229.2M
$340.3M
Q3 25
$231.1M
$272.0M
Q2 25
$227.0M
$266.4M
Q1 25
$225.0M
$217.0M
Q4 24
$227.6M
$211.8M
Q3 24
$162.5M
$97.2M
Q2 24
$166.4M
$296.4M
Total Assets
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$443.5M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$430.9M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$419.4M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$410.4M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$403.8M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$328.5M
$689.9M
Q2 24
$324.7M
$710.5M
Debt / Equity
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.68×
Q3 25
1.35×
Q2 25
1.39×
Q1 25
1.73×
Q4 24
1.82×
Q3 24
2.49×
Q2 24
1.22×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$529.0K
$41.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-13.3M
$40.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-18.1%
80.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
18.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.30×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-27.5M
$232.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$41.1M
Q4 25
$529.0K
$126.3M
Q3 25
$9.4M
$34.9M
Q2 25
$6.7M
$37.3M
Q1 25
$4.3M
$15.9M
Q4 24
$4.4M
$67.6M
Q3 24
$669.0K
$7.5M
Q2 24
$8.7M
$16.0M
Free Cash Flow
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
$40.9M
Q4 25
$-13.3M
$122.0M
Q3 25
$-79.0K
$33.7M
Q2 25
$-6.9M
$36.1M
Q1 25
$-7.3M
$15.8M
Q4 24
$-7.2M
$66.7M
Q3 24
$-9.6M
$7.1M
Q2 24
$-2.4M
$15.7M
FCF Margin
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
80.3%
Q4 25
-18.1%
214.9%
Q3 25
-0.1%
66.3%
Q2 25
-9.3%
75.9%
Q1 25
-11.2%
36.0%
Q4 24
-11.2%
182.6%
Q3 24
-14.6%
25.1%
Q2 24
-3.8%
60.4%
Capex Intensity
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
18.8%
7.5%
Q3 25
11.9%
2.3%
Q2 25
18.4%
2.6%
Q1 25
17.8%
0.2%
Q4 24
17.9%
2.7%
Q3 24
15.6%
1.1%
Q2 24
17.6%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
KRUS
KRUS
LB
LB
Q1 26
2.30×
Q4 25
15.68×
Q3 25
4.12×
4.31×
Q2 25
11.88×
4.98×
Q1 25
2.46×
Q4 24
1.37×
Q3 24
2.80×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRUS
KRUS

Segment breakdown not available.

LB
LB

Other$14.2M28%
Easements and other surface-related revenues$11.6M23%
Surface use royalties - related party$11.0M22%
Resource sales$5.2M10%
Resource royalties$4.3M8%
Easements and other surface-related revenues - related party$3.2M6%
Resource royalties - related party$1.3M2%
Resource sales - related party$205.0K0%

Related Comparisons