vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KURA SUSHI USA, INC. (KRUS) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.1M vs $73.5M, roughly 1.1× KURA SUSHI USA, INC.). KURA SUSHI USA, INC. runs the higher net margin — -4.2% vs -38.1%, a 33.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Kura Sushi, Inc. is a Japanese conveyor belt sushi restaurant chain. It is the second largest sushi restaurant chain in Japan, behind Sushiro and ahead of Hama Sushi. Its headquarters are in Sakai, Osaka Prefecture. It has 543 locations in Japan, 56 in Taiwan, and 69 in the United States.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
KRUS vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.5M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $-3.1M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.0% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | -4.2% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -218.4% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.5M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.4M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.0M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.9M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.5M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.1M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.1M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $565.0K | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-961.0K | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.2M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-558.0K | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.0% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.9% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.2% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.18 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.47 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.7M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $229.2M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $443.5M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.7M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.5M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.5M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.2M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.7M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.7M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $229.2M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.1M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.0M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.0M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.6M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.4M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $443.5M | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.9M | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $419.4M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $410.4M | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.8M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $328.5M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $324.7M | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $529.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-27.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $529.0K | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $669.0K | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.3M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-79.0K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.9M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.3M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -18.1% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.2% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.2% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRUS
Segment breakdown not available.
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
