vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ladder Capital Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.3M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.6× SuperCom Ltd). Ladder Capital Corp runs the higher net margin — 71.0% vs 37.5%, a 33.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SuperCom Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -18.0%). Ladder Capital Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($78.7M vs $-3.6M).
Ladder Capital Corp is a leading commercial real estate finance firm operating primarily across the United States. It originates and manages a diversified portfolio of senior secured commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine debt, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and direct real estate assets, serving property owners, operators and developers across major market segments.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
LADR vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.3M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $15.9M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 69.5% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 71.0% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -18.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.4% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.7% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 71.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.5% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 115.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 93.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.0M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.0M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.7M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 352.4% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 37.4% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.49× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.3M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.4M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-20.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 352.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 201.6% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -145.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 468.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 432.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 131.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
