vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE LAND Corp (LAND) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.6M vs $16.6M, roughly 1.4× GLADSTONE LAND Corp). On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -11.8%).
Hongkong Land (HKL) is a property investment, management and development group with commercial and residential property interests across Asia. It owns and manages some 850,000 sq. m. of office and retail property in Asia, principally in Hong Kong and Singapore. Its Hong Kong portfolio represents some 450,000 sq. m. of commercial property, making it the single largest landlord in Central, Hong Kong. In Singapore it has 165,000 sq. m. of office space mainly held through joint ventures. While it...
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
LAND vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.6M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 200.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.5M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $20.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0K | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-823.0K | $4.1M |
| Q1 26 | 200.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 89.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.9% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $688.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.5M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.8M | $13.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $473.6M | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.4M | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $496.4M | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.8M | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $527.5M | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.7M | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $549.4M | $410.0M |
| Q1 26 | $688.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $661.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $670.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $687.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $708.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $383.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.5M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $5.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.72× | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | -227.83× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
