vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE LAND Corp (LAND) and Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Pyxis Tankers Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.0M vs $16.6M, roughly 1.0× GLADSTONE LAND Corp).

Hongkong Land (HKL) is a property investment, management and development group with commercial and residential property interests across Asia. It owns and manages some 850,000 sq. m. of office and retail property in Asia, principally in Hong Kong and Singapore. Its Hong Kong portfolio represents some 450,000 sq. m. of commercial property, making it the single largest landlord in Central, Hong Kong. In Singapore it has 165,000 sq. m. of office space mainly held through joint ventures. While it...

Pyxis Tankers Inc. is an international maritime transport enterprise specializing in seaborne shipping of refined petroleum products and other bulk liquid cargoes. It operates a fleet of modern product tankers, serving global energy markets, with core business covering major trade routes across the Atlantic, Mediterranean and Asia-Pacific regions.

LAND vs PXS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PXS
PXS
1.0× larger
PXS
$17.0M
$16.6M
LAND

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2022

Metric
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Revenue
$16.6M
$17.0M
Net Profit
$5.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
200.3%
37.2%
Net Margin
31.3%
Revenue YoY
-1.5%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
$16.6M
Q4 25
$41.5M
Q3 25
$17.8M
Q2 25
$12.3M
Q1 25
$16.8M
Q4 24
$21.1M
Q3 24
$22.6M
Q2 24
$21.3M
Net Profit
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$4.2M
Q3 25
$2.1M
Q2 25
$-7.9M
Q1 25
$15.1M
Q4 24
$540.0K
Q3 24
$6.0K
Q2 24
$-823.0K
Operating Margin
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
200.3%
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Net Margin
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.2%
Q3 25
11.7%
Q2 25
-64.1%
Q1 25
89.9%
Q4 24
2.6%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
-3.9%
EPS (diluted)
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.05
Q3 25
$-0.11
Q2 25
$-0.38
Q1 25
$0.25
Q4 24
$-0.15
Q3 24
$-0.16
Q2 24
$-0.19

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$67.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$688.3M
$54.9M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$138.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.23×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$27.2M
Q3 25
$11.3M
Q2 25
$30.5M
Q1 25
$42.9M
Q4 24
$18.3M
Q3 24
$13.2M
Q2 24
$49.8M
Total Debt
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$473.6M
Q3 25
$480.4M
Q2 25
$496.4M
Q1 25
$498.8M
Q4 24
$527.5M
Q3 24
$530.7M
Q2 24
$549.4M
Stockholders' Equity
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
$688.3M
Q4 25
$670.3M
Q3 25
$661.8M
Q2 25
$670.1M
Q1 25
$689.9M
Q4 24
$687.2M
Q3 24
$691.2M
Q2 24
$708.5M
Total Assets
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.71×
Q3 25
0.73×
Q2 25
0.74×
Q1 25
0.72×
Q4 24
0.77×
Q3 24
0.77×
Q2 24
0.78×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.45×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.0M
Q3 25
$-12.0M
Q2 25
$3.9M
Q1 25
$4.5M
Q4 24
$29.5M
Q3 24
$-1.4M
Q2 24
$15.9M
Cash Conversion
LAND
LAND
PXS
PXS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.66×
Q3 25
-5.77×
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.30×
Q4 24
54.72×
Q3 24
-227.83×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons