vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $104.0M, roughly 1.4× Origin Bancorp, Inc.).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
Southern Bancorp is a community development financial institution headquartered in Arkadelphia, Arkansas. It was founded in 1986 as Southern Development Bancorporation, and is often referred to simply as "Southern".
LANV vs OBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $104.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $27.7M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 26.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $103.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $109.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $83.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $96.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | 27.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $10.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $424.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $626.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | $334.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $486.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $470.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $321.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $288.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | $11.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LANV
Segment breakdown not available.
OBK
| Net Interest Income | $87.2M | 84% |
| Noninterest Income | $16.8M | 16% |
