vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $144.1M, roughly 1.5× Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
LANV vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | -30.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -52.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $185.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $156.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | $-283.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $161.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | $645.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $583.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-206.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-214.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -210.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
