vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.4× Laird Superfood, Inc.). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -13.2%, a 40.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
LARK vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-239.1K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -3.4% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $12.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $18.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $642.7K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
