vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Owlet, Inc. (OWLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Owlet, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.6M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.4× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -34.6%, a 61.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Owlet, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.6% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Owlet, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.2% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Owlet, Inc. is a pediatric health technology firm that develops smart wearable monitoring products for infants, most notably its signature smart sock that tracks real-time heart rate, oxygen levels, and sleep metrics. It serves global consumer markets across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, distributing products via direct-to-consumer e-commerce and partnered retail outlets, focused on supporting parental peace of mind and infant health safety.
LARK vs OWLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $26.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -18.4% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -34.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 29.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -1.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $20.7M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -10.8% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -144.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -5.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-2.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $35.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $85.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $-59.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $-33.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $63.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $51.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $45.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-452.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-651.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-452.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | -0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | -1.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
OWLT
| US | $22.7M | 85% |
| Non Us | $3.2M | 12% |
| Other | $651.0K | 2% |
