vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $13.4M, roughly 1.4× Outdoor Holding Co). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs 16.7%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -54.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
LARK vs POWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $13.4M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -54.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 108.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $12.3M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-14.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 85.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -213.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -163.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -50.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -50.8% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -614.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -120.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $237.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $271.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $222.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $299.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $325.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $342.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $271.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $269.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $297.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $355.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $398.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-2.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-547.5K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $720.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
