vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.6× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDMARK BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
LARK vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $11.6M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-319.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -3.8% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $38.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $50.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $636.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $499.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
