vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laser Photonics Corp (LASE) and OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS Ltd (OXBR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $576.0K, roughly 1.6× OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS Ltd). OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS Ltd runs the higher net margin — 20.8% vs -506.4%, a 527.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS Ltd's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -3.9%).
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS Ltd is a Bermuda-based reinsurance firm offering property and casualty reinsurance solutions primarily to North American insurance carriers. Its key segments include specialty casualty, commercial property, and other specialty reinsurance lines tailored to client risk management needs.
LASE vs OXBR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.3K | $576.0K |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $120.0K |
| Gross Margin | -20.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -350.0% | 38.9% |
| Net Margin | -506.4% | 20.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.3% | -3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -186.5% | 126.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.27 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $576.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $919.3K | $645.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $664.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $692.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $595.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $716.7K | $595.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $623.4K | $564.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $743.0K | $549.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $120.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | $-187.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-139.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $586.4K | $-460.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-540.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-934.3K | $-821.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-545.7K | $-905.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -350.0% | -26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.0% | -301.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.7% | -18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -255.1% | -76.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -238.0% | -90.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -149.4% | -145.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.8% | -164.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -506.4% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.3% | -282.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.4% | -20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | -109.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -226.8% | -90.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -149.9% | -145.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.4% | -164.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.6M | $268.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1M | $5.9M |
| Total Assets | $17.5M | $8.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $268.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $726.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.1K | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.9K | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $532.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0M | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $7.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $763.1K | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -236.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -11.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $763.1K | $118.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $272.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | $-284.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $632.7K | $258.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $-35.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-866.3K | $-276.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $589.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -236.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -388.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -136.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
