vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laser Photonics Corp (LASE) and TaoWeave, Inc. (TWAV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $622.0K, roughly 1.5× TaoWeave, Inc.). TaoWeave, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -448.2% vs -506.4%, a 58.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs 10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, TaoWeave, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -3.9%).
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
LASE vs TWAV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.3K | $622.0K |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | -20.1% | 47.1% |
| Operating Margin | -350.0% | -126.4% |
| Net Margin | -506.4% | -448.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.3% | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -186.5% | -215.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.27 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $622.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $919.3K | $601.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $622.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $563.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $716.7K | $578.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $623.4K | $611.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $743.0K | $626.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-605.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-672.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $586.4K | $-884.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-934.3K | $-983.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-545.7K | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.5% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.8% | 40.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.9% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -126.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -350.0% | -133.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.0% | -115.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.7% | -111.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -255.1% | -164.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -238.0% | -185.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -149.4% | -166.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.8% | -189.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -448.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -506.4% | -381.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.3% | -102.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.4% | -108.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | -157.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -226.8% | -179.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -149.9% | -160.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.4% | -181.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.6M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1M | $7.0M |
| Total Assets | $17.5M | $8.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5K | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.1K | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.9K | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $4.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $5.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $763.1K | $-744.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-744.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $763.1K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $-37.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-680.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | $-255.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $632.7K | $-911.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-866.3K | $-630.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $589.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -388.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -136.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
