vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CS Disco, Inc. (LAW) and TRINITY BIOTECH PLC (TRIB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CS Disco, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $30.5M, roughly 1.4× TRINITY BIOTECH PLC). CS Disco, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -23.0% vs -33.0%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CS Disco, Inc. is a leading legal technology provider that develops cloud-based software solutions for legal practitioners. Its core offerings include e-discovery, document review, case management, and legal workflow automation tools, serving law firms, corporate legal teams, and government legal departments primarily in North America.
Trinity Biotech PLC develops, manufactures and markets diagnostic test kits and systems for clinical laboratories and point-of-care settings. Its product portfolio covers diabetes management, infectious diseases, cardiac health, autoimmune disorders and coagulation, with core markets across North America, Europe and emerging economies.
LAW vs TRIB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $30.5M |
| Net Profit | $-9.6M | $-10.1M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | -23.2% |
| Net Margin | -23.0% | -33.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $30.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $-10.1M |
| Q1 26 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.2% | 36.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -35.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | -23.2% |
| Q1 26 | -23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.1% | -33.0% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.0M | $5.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $123.9M | $-29.4M |
| Total Assets | $162.4M | $94.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $130.0M | $5.3M |
| Q1 26 | $123.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.9M | $-29.4M |
| Q1 26 | $162.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $173.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.0M | $94.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.7M | $-3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -13.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $762.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-979.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-650.0K | $-3.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | -13.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.5% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
