vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LandBridge Co LLC (LB) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $56.8M, roughly 1.0× LandBridge Co LLC). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs -171.1%, a 185.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
LB vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.8M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 60.0% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 55.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.7M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.4% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -197.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 135.2% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -222.1% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.7M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $340.3M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.68× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $570.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $366.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $340.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.8M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.4M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $162.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $710.5M | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $126.3M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.0M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 214.9% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.5% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $207.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.6M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 214.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.6% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 90.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
