vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LandBridge Co LLC (LB) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $56.8M, roughly 1.7× LandBridge Co LLC). On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs 13.7%).

Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...

LB vs PACK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PACK
PACK
1.7× larger
PACK
$93.7M
$56.8M
LB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LB
LB
+53.3% gap
LB
55.6%
2.3%
PACK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LB
LB
Annualised
LB
72.8%
13.7%
PACK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Revenue
$56.8M
$93.7M
Net Profit
$8.1M
Gross Margin
39.0%
Operating Margin
60.0%
-1.0%
Net Margin
14.2%
Revenue YoY
55.6%
2.3%
Net Profit YoY
-83.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.24
$-0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$56.8M
$93.7M
Q3 25
$50.8M
$83.6M
Q2 25
$47.5M
$77.8M
Q1 25
$44.0M
$77.6M
Q4 24
$36.5M
$91.6M
Q3 24
$28.5M
$78.6M
Q2 24
$26.0M
$72.8M
Q1 24
$19.0M
$72.5M
Net Profit
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$8.1M
Q3 25
$8.1M
$-10.4M
Q2 25
$7.5M
$-7.5M
Q1 25
$6.5M
$-10.9M
Q4 24
$49.3M
Q3 24
$2.7M
$-8.1M
Q2 24
$-57.7M
$5.5M
Q1 24
$10.8M
$-8.1M
Gross Margin
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
39.0%
Q3 25
41.1%
Q2 25
37.1%
Q1 25
39.8%
Q4 24
45.2%
Q3 24
43.8%
Q2 24
43.5%
Q1 24
44.6%
Operating Margin
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
60.0%
-1.0%
Q3 25
60.8%
-6.8%
Q2 25
60.0%
-12.5%
Q1 25
57.0%
-10.3%
Q4 24
49.4%
1.5%
Q3 24
11.2%
-5.3%
Q2 24
-197.4%
-7.1%
Q1 24
71.1%
-6.6%
Net Margin
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
14.2%
Q3 25
15.9%
-12.4%
Q2 25
15.8%
-9.6%
Q1 25
14.7%
-14.0%
Q4 24
135.2%
Q3 24
9.3%
-10.3%
Q2 24
-222.1%
7.6%
Q1 24
56.7%
-11.2%
EPS (diluted)
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$0.24
$-0.11
Q3 25
$0.26
$-0.12
Q2 25
$0.24
$-0.09
Q1 25
$0.20
$-0.13
Q4 24
$-0.13
Q3 24
$-0.04
$-0.10
Q2 24
$0.07
Q1 24
$-0.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$30.7M
$63.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$570.7M
$401.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$340.3M
$534.9M
Total Assets
$1.4B
$1.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.68×
0.75×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$30.7M
$63.0M
Q3 25
$28.3M
$49.9M
Q2 25
$20.3M
$49.2M
Q1 25
$14.9M
$65.5M
Q4 24
$37.0M
$76.1M
Q3 24
$14.4M
$69.5M
Q2 24
$24.6M
$65.1M
Q1 24
$55.1M
Total Debt
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$570.7M
$401.9M
Q3 25
$366.1M
$403.1M
Q2 25
$370.9M
$403.1M
Q1 25
$375.5M
$405.2M
Q4 24
$385.5M
$406.4M
Q3 24
$242.4M
$403.2M
Q2 24
$360.8M
$396.1M
Q1 24
$396.7M
Stockholders' Equity
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$340.3M
$534.9M
Q3 25
$272.0M
$537.8M
Q2 25
$266.4M
$539.0M
Q1 25
$217.0M
$544.1M
Q4 24
$211.8M
$548.1M
Q3 24
$97.2M
$564.3M
Q2 24
$296.4M
$566.2M
Q1 24
$162.3M
$560.0M
Total Assets
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$689.9M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$710.5M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
1.68×
0.75×
Q3 25
1.35×
0.75×
Q2 25
1.39×
0.75×
Q1 25
1.73×
0.74×
Q4 24
1.82×
0.74×
Q3 24
2.49×
0.71×
Q2 24
1.22×
0.70×
Q1 24
0.71×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$126.3M
$19.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$122.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
214.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
7.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
15.68×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$207.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$126.3M
$19.5M
Q3 25
$34.9M
$8.5M
Q2 25
$37.3M
$-3.6M
Q1 25
$15.9M
$-1.3M
Q4 24
$67.6M
$6.5M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$10.1M
Q2 24
$16.0M
$19.6M
Q1 24
$17.2M
$5.2M
Free Cash Flow
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
$122.0M
Q3 25
$33.7M
Q2 25
$36.1M
Q1 25
$15.8M
Q4 24
$66.7M
Q3 24
$7.1M
Q2 24
$15.7M
Q1 24
$17.1M
FCF Margin
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
214.9%
Q3 25
66.3%
Q2 25
75.9%
Q1 25
36.0%
Q4 24
182.6%
Q3 24
25.1%
Q2 24
60.4%
Q1 24
90.1%
Capex Intensity
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
7.5%
Q3 25
2.3%
Q2 25
2.6%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q4 24
2.7%
Q3 24
1.1%
Q2 24
1.4%
Q1 24
0.5%
Cash Conversion
LB
LB
PACK
PACK
Q4 25
15.68×
Q3 25
4.31×
Q2 25
4.98×
Q1 25
2.46×
Q4 24
1.37×
Q3 24
2.80×
Q2 24
3.56×
Q1 24
1.60×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LB
LB

Segment breakdown not available.

PACK
PACK

Other$47.9M51%
Europe And Asia Segment$45.8M49%

Related Comparisons