vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LandBridge Co LLC (LB) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.2× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs -1.9%, a 16.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 55.6%).
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
LB vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.8M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | 60.0% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 55.6% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.7% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.0% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.4% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -197.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 135.2% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -222.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.7M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $340.3M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.68× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $570.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $366.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $340.3M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.0M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.4M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.0M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.8M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $162.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.9M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $710.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $126.3M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 214.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $207.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 214.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 90.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LB
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
