vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and MACH NATURAL RESOURCES LP (MNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MACH NATURAL RESOURCES LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($387.5M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.5× LendingClub Corp). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 18.9%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MACH NATURAL RESOURCES LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (65.0% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, MACH NATURAL RESOURCES LP's revenue compounded faster (27.3% CAGR vs 16.1%).

LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.

Mach Natural Resources LP is a US-based upstream energy enterprise focused on the exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. Its core operations are located in onshore US hydrocarbon basins including the Permian Basin, prioritizing low-cost, high-yield assets to drive sustainable returns for stakeholders.

LC vs MNR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MNR
MNR
1.5× larger
MNR
$387.5M
$252.3M
LC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MNR
MNR
+49.1% gap
MNR
65.0%
15.9%
LC
Higher net margin
LC
LC
1.6% more per $
LC
20.5%
18.9%
MNR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MNR
MNR
Annualised
MNR
27.3%
16.1%
LC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Revenue
$252.3M
$387.5M
Net Profit
$51.6M
$73.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
26.1%
Net Margin
20.5%
18.9%
Revenue YoY
15.9%
65.0%
Net Profit YoY
341.0%
100.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44
$0.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
$252.3M
Q4 25
$266.5M
$387.5M
Q3 25
$266.2M
$272.6M
Q2 25
$248.4M
$288.5M
Q1 25
$217.7M
$226.8M
Q4 24
$217.2M
$234.9M
Q3 24
$201.9M
$255.5M
Q2 24
$187.2M
$240.0M
Net Profit
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
$51.6M
Q4 25
$73.1M
Q3 25
$44.3M
$-35.7M
Q2 25
$38.2M
$89.7M
Q1 25
$11.7M
$15.9M
Q4 24
$36.5M
Q3 24
$14.5M
$67.4M
Q2 24
$14.9M
$39.5M
Operating Margin
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
18.8%
26.1%
Q3 25
21.5%
-7.0%
Q2 25
21.7%
38.6%
Q1 25
7.2%
22.8%
Q4 24
5.1%
24.9%
Q3 24
8.9%
37.1%
Q2 24
10.4%
29.4%
Net Margin
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
20.5%
Q4 25
18.9%
Q3 25
16.6%
-13.1%
Q2 25
15.4%
31.1%
Q1 25
5.4%
7.0%
Q4 24
15.5%
Q3 24
7.2%
26.4%
Q2 24
8.0%
16.5%
EPS (diluted)
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
$0.44
Q4 25
$0.36
$0.47
Q3 25
$0.37
$-0.28
Q2 25
$0.33
$0.76
Q1 25
$0.10
$0.14
Q4 24
$0.08
$0.34
Q3 24
$0.13
$0.70
Q2 24
$0.13
$0.42

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$42.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
Total Assets
$11.9B
$3.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$42.6M
Q3 25
$53.6M
Q2 25
$13.8M
Q1 25
$7.8M
Q4 24
$105.8M
Q3 24
$184.5M
Q2 24
$144.6M
Total Debt
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0
Q3 25
$0
Q2 25
$0
Q1 25
$0
Q4 24
$0
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Total Assets
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
$11.9B
Q4 25
$11.6B
$3.8B
Q3 25
$11.1B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$10.8B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$10.5B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$10.6B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$11.0B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$9.6B
$2.2B
Debt / Equity
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.00×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$128.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-2.7B
$128.7M
Q3 25
$-770.8M
$105.5M
Q2 25
$-713.1M
$130.1M
Q1 25
$-339.3M
$142.5M
Q4 24
$-2.6B
$133.7M
Q3 24
$-669.8M
$110.8M
Q2 24
$-932.5M
$116.8M
Free Cash Flow
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-2.9B
Q3 25
$-791.8M
Q2 25
$-803.8M
Q1 25
$-352.3M
Q4 24
$-2.7B
Q3 24
$-682.3M
Q2 24
$-945.3M
FCF Margin
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1076.0%
Q3 25
-297.4%
Q2 25
-323.5%
Q1 25
-161.8%
Q4 24
-1237.8%
Q3 24
-338.0%
Q2 24
-504.9%
Capex Intensity
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
52.7%
Q3 25
7.9%
Q2 25
36.5%
Q1 25
6.0%
Q4 24
25.0%
Q3 24
6.2%
Q2 24
6.9%
Cash Conversion
LC
LC
MNR
MNR
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.76×
Q3 25
-17.41×
Q2 25
-18.68×
1.45×
Q1 25
-29.07×
8.97×
Q4 24
3.66×
Q3 24
-46.33×
1.64×
Q2 24
-62.57×
2.96×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LC
LC

Segment breakdown not available.

MNR
MNR

Oil Gas And Natural Gas Liquids Net$331.0M85%
Natural Gas Liquids Reserves$44.8M12%
Natural Gas Midstream$8.6M2%
Products$6.3M2%

Related Comparisons