vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $137.2M, roughly 1.8× MAXLINEAR, INC). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs -32.9%, a 53.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 16.1%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
LC vs MXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $137.2M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | -32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 43.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | -203.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | $137.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $136.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $95.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $92.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | $-45.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $-39.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | -32.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | -22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | -44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | -44.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | -32.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | -36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | -51.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | -93.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -42.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $61.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $123.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $454.2M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $771.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $185.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $454.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $464.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $488.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $493.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $516.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $556.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $617.3M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $771.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $855.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $864.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $895.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $973.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
