vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $130.3M, roughly 1.9× N-able, Inc.). On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 7.0%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
LC vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $119.4M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $9.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 18.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $157.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $334.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $724.4M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.7B | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-770.8M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-713.1M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-339.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6B | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-669.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-932.5M | $27.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9B | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-791.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-803.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-352.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7B | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-682.3M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-945.3M | $24.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1076.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -323.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -161.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1237.8% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -338.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.9% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.41× | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.33× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.57× | 2.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
