vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.0× Tecnoglass Inc.). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 10.6%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 12.8%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
LC vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $219.7M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $942.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.7B | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-770.8M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-713.1M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-339.3M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6B | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-669.8M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-932.5M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9B | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-791.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-803.8M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-352.3M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7B | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-682.3M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-945.3M | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1076.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -323.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -161.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1237.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -338.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.9% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.41× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.68× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.07× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.33× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.57× | 0.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
