vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRIMAS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.5M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.0× LendingClub Corp). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 20.5%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 3.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 3.3%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.
LC vs TRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $81.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | 236.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | $256.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $269.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $-66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $229.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $240.5M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $81.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $30.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $705.6M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $434.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $398.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $427.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $705.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $705.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $725.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $715.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $686.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $667.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $682.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $675.9M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $117.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $36.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 18.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $109.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.7B | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-770.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-713.1M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-339.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6B | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-669.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-932.5M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9B | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-791.8M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-803.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-352.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7B | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-682.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-945.3M | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1076.0% | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -323.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -161.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1237.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -338.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.9% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.41× | 3.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.68× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.07× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.33× | 8.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.57× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.