vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UL Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.3× LendingClub Corp). On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -12.4%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -31.8%).

LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.

The UL enterprise is a global private safety company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, composed of three organizations, UL Research Institutes, UL Standards & Engagement and UL Solutions.

LC vs ULS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ULS
ULS
1.3× larger
ULS
$340.0M
$252.3M
LC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LC
LC
+28.3% gap
LC
15.9%
-12.4%
ULS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LC
LC
Annualised
LC
16.1%
-31.8%
ULS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Revenue
$252.3M
$340.0M
Net Profit
$51.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
24.4%
Net Margin
20.5%
Revenue YoY
15.9%
-12.4%
Net Profit YoY
341.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$252.3M
$340.0M
Q4 25
$266.5M
$789.0M
Q3 25
$266.2M
$783.0M
Q2 25
$248.4M
$776.0M
Q1 25
$217.7M
$705.0M
Q4 24
$217.2M
$739.0M
Q3 24
$201.9M
$731.0M
Q2 24
$187.2M
$730.0M
Net Profit
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$51.6M
Q4 25
$67.0M
Q3 25
$44.3M
$100.0M
Q2 25
$38.2M
$91.0M
Q1 25
$11.7M
$67.0M
Q4 24
$81.0M
Q3 24
$14.5M
$88.0M
Q2 24
$14.9M
$101.0M
Gross Margin
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
49.7%
Q3 25
50.3%
Q2 25
49.4%
Q1 25
48.4%
Q4 24
47.4%
Q3 24
49.0%
Q2 24
50.1%
Operating Margin
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
24.4%
Q4 25
18.8%
15.0%
Q3 25
21.5%
19.9%
Q2 25
21.7%
17.9%
Q1 25
7.2%
15.5%
Q4 24
5.1%
15.6%
Q3 24
8.9%
17.8%
Q2 24
10.4%
17.3%
Net Margin
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
20.5%
Q4 25
8.5%
Q3 25
16.6%
12.8%
Q2 25
15.4%
11.7%
Q1 25
5.4%
9.5%
Q4 24
11.0%
Q3 24
7.2%
12.0%
Q2 24
8.0%
13.8%
EPS (diluted)
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$0.44
Q4 25
$0.36
$0.33
Q3 25
$0.37
$0.49
Q2 25
$0.33
$0.45
Q1 25
$0.10
$0.33
Q4 24
$0.08
$0.40
Q3 24
$0.13
$0.44
Q2 24
$0.13
$0.50

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
Total Assets
$11.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$295.0M
Q3 25
$255.0M
Q2 25
$272.0M
Q1 25
$267.0M
Q4 24
$298.0M
Q3 24
$327.0M
Q2 24
$295.0M
Total Debt
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0
$491.0M
Q3 25
$0
$544.0M
Q2 25
$0
$608.0M
Q1 25
$0
$653.0M
Q4 24
$0
$742.0M
Q3 24
$797.0M
Q2 24
$810.0M
Stockholders' Equity
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$970.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$904.0M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$872.0M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$769.0M
Total Assets
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$11.9B
Q4 25
$11.6B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$11.1B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$10.8B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$10.5B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$10.6B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$11.0B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$9.6B
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
LC
LC
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.00×
0.39×
Q3 25
0.00×
0.46×
Q2 25
0.00×
0.56×
Q1 25
0.00×
0.67×
Q4 24
0.00×
0.82×
Q3 24
0.91×
Q2 24
1.05×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons